Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and other required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions: What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity? Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected? How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action? What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action? Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. (I will send the topic materials separately) While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Please add an introductory and summary paragraph.

 Each student will consider an aspect of his/her behavior that he/she would like to change. Students will assess the “problem” and develop an intervention plan to assist in reaching his or her goals. Students will develop single-subject design research projects to evaluate the impact of his or her intervention. Write-ups from the projects should describe the following: The problem The goals/desired outcomes in measurable terms (dependent variable) The intervention (independent variable) The operational definition of each variable Baseline phase. 7 days Intervention phase. Another 7 days Interpretation of the results Overall evaluation and next steps based on the outcomes of the single-subject design.

Case outline: Section 1: Executive summary: This section should never exceed a single page. In this section, you should highlight the main takeaways of your analysis. This section should end with a couple of sentences discussing your overall recommendation. Section 2: Analysis: In this section, you can discuss your analysis and directly answer my questions. There is a5-page (1.5 space) limit of text in this section. If you would like to provide tables or figures you can create an appendix at the end of this section. Tables and figures do not count toward the 5-page limit. You MUST show all of your calculations in the appendix. Please be prepared to produce the electronic Excel file in case I ask for it. Section 3: Conclusion and recommendation: You need to tell us again the most important points of your analysis and make a recommendation (essential). Remarks：it’s very important. Please provide the electronic Excel file to me. Thanks Grading Policy： Your grade critically depends on the quality of the content. There are two determinants of quality: (1) analysis and (2) recommendation. Before doing your analysis, please make sure that you fully understand the problem. This might not be trivial since in a typical case you will be provided an “ocean” of information and you might lose track. Moreover, often times a critical piece of information will not even be provided and as a result, you will either have to make a setof reasonable assumptions or get what you need by doing research. Once you clearly understand the problem, provide a thorough analysis. Regarding your recommendation, first make sure that you have one. In each case, you will be playing the role of a decision maker and you MUST make a decision. Playing safe with recommendation will cost you (e.g. never say things like “you do not know what to do” or “anything is possible”). Second, your recommendation must be internallyconsistent with your analysis. Projects can earn 100%, 88%, 80% or 0%. At most 20% of the projects can earn 100%. Case Report Cosmetics: I will also judge your case reports based on presentation (it will not contribute more than 10% to your overall case score but it will still affect your score). First step in a clear presentation is making sure that your presentation is EASILY readable (this becomes an issue when you are reporting the numbers taken out of an Excel sheet). Next, please make sure that the reader does not have to make educated guesses on how to browse through your document. If you need to refer to a table in appendix, be very specific. You should never forget that your analysis is your product and delivery is certainly important.

 Context for the piece: This week we will be reading two historians who have proposed different interpretations of the long-term trajectory of German history in the twentieth century. The fundamental question they ask is whether German social and political history was fundamentally different from the history of Western countries (a special path) or whether similarities outweigh the differences. Is there something unique in German history that led to two World Wars and the Rise of Nazism? Please read the below document and answer the following question, taking into account the context of the question: According to Wehler, what is the problem with modern German history? DOCUMENT 1: HANS-ULRICH WEHLER The German Empire 1871-1918 reproduced in Neil Gregor (ed.). Nazism (Oxford, 2000) pp. 63-65 In the concluding passages to one of the classic texts advocating the Sonderweg thesis, Hans-Ulrich Wehler argues for the need to understand National Socialism through analysis of authoritarian structures and culture going back to the ‘configuration of 1871’. The unbroken tradition of government by pre-industrial power-élites, the prolongation of absolutism among the military the weakness of liberalism and the very early appearance of deliberalising measures suggest on the surface a depoliticising of society, but one which deep down favoured a continuation of the status quo. The same can be said of the barriers to social mobility the holding over of differences and various norms between separ¬ate estates, which is such a revealing aspect of Imperial Germany, and the essentially elitist character of education. Much of this resulted from the political weakness and defeats suffered by the bourgeoisie in the nineteenth century, and all these factors, which are given here only as examples, had assumed their importance during a phase of historical development which was uninterrupted by a successful revolution. They were further strengthened by the success of Bismarck’s policies for legitimising the status quo.

Essay Questions: 1. Describe Developmental crime prevention and intervention 2. Describe social crime and prevention 3. Describe Prediction and name five implications on crime prevention 4. Explain situational crime prevention – Gluony, Typology and studies